Fellow vs Krisp AI: Comparing Integrations, Recording Flexibility, and Meeting Workflows

Krisp and Fellow both offer bot-free recording and AI-generated meeting notes, but they approach the problem from very different angles.

Krisp started as an audio-engineering company — its noise cancellation technology earned a TIME Best Inventions nod in 2020 — and has since layered on transcription, summaries, and CRM integrations.

Fellow was purpose-built as a secure AI meeting assistant designed to turn meetings into searchable, actionable intelligence across an entire organization.

That origin story matters because it shapes what each tool does best. Krisp excels at making calls sound clean. Fellow excels at making sure what happens in those calls actually drives work forward — through deep integrations, cross-meeting AI search, and team-wide collaboration features.

The verdict: For teams and organizations that need meeting data to flow into Salesforce, HubSpot, Asana, Jira, and 50+ other tools — with enterprise-grade security, cross-meeting intelligence, and dedicated human support — Fellow is the clear winner. Krisp is a capable option for individuals who prioritize noise cancellation above all else, but individual reviewers say it falls short on integrations, AI depth, and team collaboration.

Fellow vs Krisp at a glance

AI transcription and language support

Fellow transcribes meetings with 95%+ accuracy across 92 languages, giving global teams consistent results regardless of accents, technical jargon, or meeting format.

As Aron Kantor from The Business Dive noted after testing 20+ AI note-takers over 2+ years, transcription accuracy is one of the most critical differentiators between meeting tools — and inconsistent accuracy creates compounding problems for teams that rely on meeting records for decision-making.

Krisp takes a different approach by processing English transcription on-device for maximum privacy, with cloud-based transcription available for 15 additional languages. Its noise cancellation genuinely improves transcript quality in loud environments — an advantage for remote workers in cafes or open offices. However, an online review noted, individual reviewers say Krisp's AI-generated meeting notes offer limited customization and lack the contextual understanding that teams need for actionable follow-ups. The review concluded that Krisp's "AI assistant capabilities are essentially nonexistent" beyond basic summarization.

The bigger difference is what happens after transcription. Fellow's Ask Fellow lets users query across all meetings they have access to — surfacing patterns like blocked projects, at-risk commitments, and recurring decisions across weeks or months of conversations. Krisp offers per-meeting AI chat, but that organization-wide intelligence layer doesn't exist.

Integrations: turning meetings into action at scale

This is where the gap between the two tools is most significant.

Fellow offers 50+ native integrations, including CRM integrations (Salesforce and HubSpot) and a bidirectional sync with project management tools that automatically pushes action items — with owners and due dates — into project management workflows.

Fellow also provides an API, MCP Server (connecting meeting data to Claude, ChatGPT, and Cursor), and access to 8,000+ apps through Zapier and n8n.

Krisp connects to Salesforce and HubSpot on its Business and Enterprise plans, along with Slack and Zapier. For teams that only need CRM logging, that may be enough. But a another online review of Krisp found, individual reviewers say the "integration ecosystem remains limited, which may frustrate teams looking for seamless cross-platform automation." There is no native Asana, Jira, Linear, or Notion integrations — and CRM access requires upgrading to the $15/user/month Business tier.

For sales teams that need meeting intelligence flowing into their CRM and project managers who need action items to land in their task boards without manual copy-and-paste, Fellow's integration depth is a decisive advantage.

→ See Fellow's 50+ integrations and start your 14-day trial

Enterprise security and compliance

Both Fellow and Krisp hold SOC 2 Type II certification, GDPR compliance, and HIPAA compliance. Neither tool trains on customer data, and both encrypt data at rest (AES-256) and in transit.

But Fellow stands out by providing privacy controls aligned to organizational roles, with permission-based access that ensures only authorized team members can view specific recordings. For organizations rolling out meeting intelligence across hundreds of users, Fellow's admin controls, governance features, and dedicated account management are built for enterprise-scale deployment — while Krisp's admin tooling (SSO, SCIM) is gated behind the Business and Enterprise tiers.

→ Try Fellow free for 14 days - no credit card required

Quotes from real Krisp users who switched to Fellow

Based on conversations with customers evaluating or switching from Krisp, here are the most common reasons teams choose Fellow.

"Krisp didn't connect to our CRM the way we needed"

One Project Manager testing Krisp said:

"We tested Krisp... seemed good at identifying who's who on a call, but didn't look like it was quite as solid in terms of follow-up actions into Salesforce."

Fellow integrates directly with Salesforce and HubSpot, automatically syncing meeting notes, action items, and follow-ups to the right contacts and opportunities — without requiring a Business-tier upgrade.

"We needed Asana and Jira sync — nobody else had it"

As one user evaluating multiple tools put it: "None of the others do that," referring to Fellow's bidirectional action item sync with Asana and Jira. For project-driven teams, this eliminates the manual step of copying tasks from meeting notes into a task board.

"Krisp slowed down our systems"

A Manager at a healthcare organization explained:

"Our first one we trialed was Krisp. It just didn't work very well. It seemed to kind of slow down our system a lot when we tried to use it. And I was also missing a few features that we were expecting to have."

This aligns with broader feedback. As Fellow's Krisp alternatives analysis found, individual reviewers mention "high RAM and CPU usage, random crashes, and lag during calls" — a consequence of Krisp's on-device processing model, which can strain older hardware or machines running multiple applications.

"Having a real person to talk to made the difference"

One user testing multiple platforms said:

"I sure like also having you there to talk to somebody. I will tell you that the other tools that I checked with... it's always a chatbot that you're talking to. It's not necessarily a person. So I think Fellow is distinguishing itself as well by having somebody that's always available to talk to... a real person."

Fellow provides dedicated account managers and real-time human support. Krisp's support is chatbot-first, with human assistance limited to higher-tier plans.

"We needed team collaboration, not just individual notes"

Fellow's recording channels, shared templates, company meeting library, and recording library enable team-wide collaboration on meeting content — so context doesn't live in one person's notes. Krisp's meeting features remain more focused on individual capture and playback, without the shared workflows that growing teams require.

Pricing comparison and value breakdown

The pricing gap is less about the sticker price and more about what's included at each tier. Fellow's Team plan at $7/user/month includes cross-meeting AI search, action item sync to PM tools, and 50+ integrations. Krisp's Pro plan at $8/user/month includes unlimited transcription and noise cancellation — but limits integrations to Slack and Zapier, and gates CRM access, SSO, and SCIM behind the $15/user/month Business plan.

For a 20-person team that needs CRM integration, the annual cost comparison is stark: Fellow Team at $1,680/year vs. Krisp Business at $3,600/year.

→ Start your 14-day Fellow trial — plans from $7/user/month

FAQ

Does Krisp specialize in noise cancellation?

Yes. If noise removal is the single most important feature for your workflow (e.g. you work at a call centre), Krisp was designed for that. For teams that also need workflow integrations and cross-meeting intelligence, Fellow covers the broader set of requirements.

How many languages does Krisp support compared to Fellow?

Krisp supports transcription in 16 languages, with on-device processing available only in English. Fellow supports 92 languages with consistent accuracy, making it a better fit for global organizations and multilingual meetings.

Can Krisp replace Fellow for team meeting workflows?

For individuals who primarily need noise cancellation and basic transcription, Krisp works well as a standalone tool. For teams that need shared meeting libraries, collaborative recording channels, bidirectional task sync, and organization-wide intelligence, Fellow provides the collaboration layer that Krisp doesn't offer. Customers switching from Krisp to Fellow most frequently cite integration depth, human support, and team features as the deciding factors.

Is Fellow or Krisp more secure?

Both hold SOC 2 Type II certification and are GDPR and HIPAA compliant. Neither trains AI models on customer data. The key difference is deployment model: Krisp's on-device English transcription keeps audio local, while Fellow's permission-based privacy controls and role-aligned access give enterprise IT teams the governance needed for company-wide rollouts.